https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310312 The HC overturned the District Judge's decision that dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal as time-barred. The plaintiffs initially filed a suit for a declaration regarding the alienation of ancestral property, later seeking to amend it to a suit for possession. The District Judge allowed the amendment but upheld the defendants' plea of limitation, dismissing the appeal. The HC found this decision erroneous, ruling that the suit was not time-barred and remanded the case for further proceedings. The revision petition was accepted, allowing the plaintiffs to pursue their claim for possession, with costs to be borne by them. en-us Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Oct 2023 14:55:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310312 The HC overturned the District Judge's decision that dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal as time-barred. The plaintiffs initially filed a suit for a declaration regarding the alienation of ancestral property, later seeking to amend it to a suit for possession. The District Judge allowed the amendment but upheld the defendants' plea of limitation, dismissing the appeal. The HC found this decision erroneous, ruling that the suit was not time-barred and remanded the case for further proceedings. The revision petition was accepted, allowing the plaintiffs to pursue their claim for possession, with costs to be borne by them. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310312