https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444569 Bombay HC allowed the petition challenging cancellation of petitioner's registration. The court found the show cause notice defective as it failed to provide specific reasons or grounds for the alleged fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts. The designated officer's cancellation order was inherently defective, lacking discussion of petitioner's reply or supporting documents. The court relied on precedents in Monit Trading and Nirakar Ramchandra Pradhan cases involving similar circumstances. The show cause notice and cancellation order were quashed and set aside due to procedural deficiencies. en-us Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444569 Bombay HC allowed the petition challenging cancellation of petitioner's registration. The court found the show cause notice defective as it failed to provide specific reasons or grounds for the alleged fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts. The designated officer's cancellation order was inherently defective, lacking discussion of petitioner's reply or supporting documents. The court relied on precedents in Monit Trading and Nirakar Ramchandra Pradhan cases involving similar circumstances. The show cause notice and cancellation order were quashed and set aside due to procedural deficiencies. Case-Laws GST Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444569