<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 791 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444568</link>
    <description>HC resolved GST reimbursement dispute by directing respondents to expedite tax differential payment and process petitioner&#039;s representation within 6 months. Court prohibited coercive actions against petitioner, mandated direct payment of differential tax to specified accounts, and ensured timely settlement of outstanding GST claims without imposing additional costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 791 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444568</link>
      <description>HC resolved GST reimbursement dispute by directing respondents to expedite tax differential payment and process petitioner&#039;s representation within 6 months. Court prohibited coercive actions against petitioner, mandated direct payment of differential tax to specified accounts, and ensured timely settlement of outstanding GST claims without imposing additional costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>