<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 788 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444565</link>
    <description>The HC examined a challenge to tax assessment orders under TNGST Act, 2017 due to return discrepancies. The court directed the petitioner to explain the case within two months, mandating a 20% pre-deposit of disputed tax within 30 days. The respondents were instructed to resolve the matter within eight weeks. Writ petitions were disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 788 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444565</link>
      <description>The HC examined a challenge to tax assessment orders under TNGST Act, 2017 due to return discrepancies. The court directed the petitioner to explain the case within two months, mandating a 20% pre-deposit of disputed tax within 30 days. The respondents were instructed to resolve the matter within eight weeks. Writ petitions were disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>