<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court: Telecom License Fee Under New Policy 1999 Classified as Capital Expenditure Despite Installments.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72623</link>
    <description>Nature of expenses - apportioning the licence fee as partly revenue and partly capital - variable licence fee paid by the assessees under the New Telecom Policy, 1999 - it cannot be axiomatically held that an expenditure which in its core, capital in nature, is actually to be treated as a revenue expenditure simply because the payment is structured in instalments. - Though the licence fee is payable in a staggered or deferred manner, the nature of the payment, which flows plainly from the licensing conditions, cannot be recharacterized. - Such a payment has to be treated or characterized as capital only. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 07:43:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 07:43:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court: Telecom License Fee Under New Policy 1999 Classified as Capital Expenditure Despite Installments.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72623</link>
      <description>Nature of expenses - apportioning the licence fee as partly revenue and partly capital - variable licence fee paid by the assessees under the New Telecom Policy, 1999 - it cannot be axiomatically held that an expenditure which in its core, capital in nature, is actually to be treated as a revenue expenditure simply because the payment is structured in instalments. - Though the licence fee is payable in a staggered or deferred manner, the nature of the payment, which flows plainly from the licensing conditions, cannot be recharacterized. - Such a payment has to be treated or characterized as capital only. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 07:43:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>