<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs House Agent&#039;s Penalty u/s 112(a) Overturned Due to Lack of Evidence on Importer Verification Breach.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72603</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 - Customs House Agent (CHA) - violation of Regulation 13 of CHALR 2004 - It is alleged that the appellant did not verify the antecedents of the importer - The department has not been able to establish sufficient grounds for imposing penalty under section 112 (a) of Customs Act 1962. The penalty imposed is not warranted and not justified. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 07:41:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 07:41:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs House Agent&#039;s Penalty u/s 112(a) Overturned Due to Lack of Evidence on Importer Verification Breach.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72603</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 - Customs House Agent (CHA) - violation of Regulation 13 of CHALR 2004 - It is alleged that the appellant did not verify the antecedents of the importer - The department has not been able to establish sufficient grounds for imposing penalty under section 112 (a) of Customs Act 1962. The penalty imposed is not warranted and not justified. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 07:41:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>