https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310308 Allegations that did not disclose the appellants' participation in the sale transaction, possession of the disputed property, or any other overt act were held insufficient to sustain criminal process under the High Court's inherent jurisdiction. The material showed, at most, a civil property dispute between family members, and the appellants were implicated only because of their relationship. Applying settled principles for quashing, the Court treated the complaint, FIR and consequential proceedings as an abuse of process and held that they were liable to be quashed where no offence was disclosed on the face of the complaint and accompanying material. en-us Mon, 28 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Oct 2023 05:30:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310308 Allegations that did not disclose the appellants' participation in the sale transaction, possession of the disputed property, or any other overt act were held insufficient to sustain criminal process under the High Court's inherent jurisdiction. The material showed, at most, a civil property dispute between family members, and the appellants were implicated only because of their relationship. Applying settled principles for quashing, the Court treated the complaint, FIR and consequential proceedings as an abuse of process and held that they were liable to be quashed where no offence was disclosed on the face of the complaint and accompanying material. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310308