<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1588 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310303</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging cancellation of registration under CGST/UPGST Act, 2017. The court held that petitioner must exhaust the statutory alternative remedy available in the form of appeal under the Act before approaching the court. The dismissal was based on the well-established principle that when legislation provides a specific appellate mechanism, parties must first utilize those remedies before seeking judicial intervention through writ jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 10:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1588 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310303</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging cancellation of registration under CGST/UPGST Act, 2017. The court held that petitioner must exhaust the statutory alternative remedy available in the form of appeal under the Act before approaching the court. The dismissal was based on the well-established principle that when legislation provides a specific appellate mechanism, parties must first utilize those remedies before seeking judicial intervention through writ jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>