<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 120 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34314</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata upheld the demand of Service Tax on the gross amount received by the security agency, rejecting the contention that tax should only be paid on the service charge. The penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 were reduced to a composite penalty of Rs. 50,000.00 considering the Appellants&#039; regular payment of Service Tax on service charges. The Appeal was disposed of with these terms set by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 120 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34314</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata upheld the demand of Service Tax on the gross amount received by the security agency, rejecting the contention that tax should only be paid on the service charge. The penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 were reduced to a composite penalty of Rs. 50,000.00 considering the Appellants&#039; regular payment of Service Tax on service charges. The Appeal was disposed of with these terms set by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>