<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 558 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310291</link>
    <description>The HC of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a writ petition challenging a notice issued under Sections 147/148 of the IT Act, 1961. The court ruled that objections should be filed with the Assessing Officer, who must address them prior to proceeding with the assessment, in line with the precedent set in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd v. ITO. The petition was considered not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 16:47:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 558 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310291</link>
      <description>The HC of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a writ petition challenging a notice issued under Sections 147/148 of the IT Act, 1961. The court ruled that objections should be filed with the Assessing Officer, who must address them prior to proceeding with the assessment, in line with the precedent set in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd v. ITO. The petition was considered not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>