<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Second Refund Application Timely; Initial Application Filed Within Two-Year Limit Validates Claim.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72595</link>
    <description>Refund of excess amount paid by mistake - time limitation - relevant date - removal of defects - keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has filed the refund application within a period of two years i.e on 18.10.2019, his second application dated 05.11.2019 after removing the deficiency, could not have been rejected on the ground that it was time barred. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 10:40:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 11:42:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Second Refund Application Timely; Initial Application Filed Within Two-Year Limit Validates Claim.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72595</link>
      <description>Refund of excess amount paid by mistake - time limitation - relevant date - removal of defects - keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has filed the refund application within a period of two years i.e on 18.10.2019, his second application dated 05.11.2019 after removing the deficiency, could not have been rejected on the ground that it was time barred. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 10:40:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>