<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 715 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444492</link>
    <description>The HC upheld provisional attachment orders under Section 83 of CGST Act. Despite challenging the Commissioner&#039;s decision, the court found the orders valid and directed the petitioner to file objections under Rule 159(5) within one week. The petition was rejected, but the petitioner retained the right to challenge the attachment through administrative remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 715 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444492</link>
      <description>The HC upheld provisional attachment orders under Section 83 of CGST Act. Despite challenging the Commissioner&#039;s decision, the court found the orders valid and directed the petitioner to file objections under Rule 159(5) within one week. The petition was rejected, but the petitioner retained the right to challenge the attachment through administrative remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>