https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444461 The CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Xioami Technology, regarding the classification of imported Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) panels. The court set aside the previous orders by the Original Authority and Commissioner (Appeals), which had classified the panels under Chapter Heading 8529 9090. The CESTAT determined that the panels should be classified under Chapter Heading 9013 8010, aligning with a Supreme Court judgment and a prior Tribunal decision. The appeals were allowed, granting any consequential relief to the appellant. en-us Fri, 13 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:37:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444461 The CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Xioami Technology, regarding the classification of imported Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) panels. The court set aside the previous orders by the Original Authority and Commissioner (Appeals), which had classified the panels under Chapter Heading 8529 9090. The CESTAT determined that the panels should be classified under Chapter Heading 9013 8010, aligning with a Supreme Court judgment and a prior Tribunal decision. The appeals were allowed, granting any consequential relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 13 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444461