<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 676 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the appellant was not required to reverse cenvat credit for Management Consultancy Service under Rule 6(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. This rule exempts certain services from credit reversal requirements applicable under Rule 6(1), 6(2), and 6(3). Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order that demanded the reversal of credit, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:37:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 676 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the appellant was not required to reverse cenvat credit for Management Consultancy Service under Rule 6(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. This rule exempts certain services from credit reversal requirements applicable under Rule 6(1), 6(2), and 6(3). Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order that demanded the reversal of credit, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>