<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 673 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444450</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the impugned order and allowed the appeal, entitling the appellant to cenvat credit. It determined that the job workers&#039; payment of service tax was not exempt under the relevant notifications and was not illegal. The Tribunal emphasized that there is no mandatory requirement to avail service tax exemptions, allowing the job worker to choose to pay the tax. Since the jurisdictional officer did not contest the service tax payment, the cenvat credit claimed by the appellant could not be denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:36:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 673 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444450</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the impugned order and allowed the appeal, entitling the appellant to cenvat credit. It determined that the job workers&#039; payment of service tax was not exempt under the relevant notifications and was not illegal. The Tribunal emphasized that there is no mandatory requirement to avail service tax exemptions, allowing the job worker to choose to pay the tax. Since the jurisdictional officer did not contest the service tax payment, the cenvat credit claimed by the appellant could not be denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>