https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310285 The HC directed the respondents to decide on the petitioner's claim for a GST refund within 60 days, considering the changes in GST rates and the petitioner's unaddressed requests. Despite the State's argument for arbitration due to an existing clause in the contract, the Court found that arbitration was not yet necessary as the claim had not been formally rejected or disputed. The writ petition was disposed of, allowing the petitioner to pursue further remedies based on the respondents' forthcoming decision. en-us Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Oct 2023 18:55:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310285 The HC directed the respondents to decide on the petitioner's claim for a GST refund within 60 days, considering the changes in GST rates and the petitioner's unaddressed requests. Despite the State's argument for arbitration due to an existing clause in the contract, the Court found that arbitration was not yet necessary as the claim had not been formally rejected or disputed. The writ petition was disposed of, allowing the petitioner to pursue further remedies based on the respondents' forthcoming decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310285