<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1957 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310281</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Assessing Officer&#039;s order regarding the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) determination and remanded the case to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for reconsideration. The TPO was instructed to evaluate the evidence provided by the assessee and determine the ALP in accordance with the law, ensuring that the services rendered by the associated enterprises (AEs) are not disputed. The assessee was permitted to submit a transfer pricing study for each international transaction separately if necessary. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the issues related to interest under sections 234B and 234D were deemed consequential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 18:55:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1957 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310281</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Assessing Officer&#039;s order regarding the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) determination and remanded the case to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for reconsideration. The TPO was instructed to evaluate the evidence provided by the assessee and determine the ALP in accordance with the law, ensuring that the services rendered by the associated enterprises (AEs) are not disputed. The assessee was permitted to submit a transfer pricing study for each international transaction separately if necessary. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the issues related to interest under sections 234B and 234D were deemed consequential.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>