<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 665 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444442</link>
    <description>Status quo was directed to be maintained as it existed before the EOGM dated 03.05.2019 until delivery of the reserved judgment, because the appeal challenging that EOGM decision had been heard over several dates and the tribunal considered preservation of the existing position necessary in view of the scheduled e-voting for the AGM.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 18:53:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 665 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444442</link>
      <description>Status quo was directed to be maintained as it existed before the EOGM dated 03.05.2019 until delivery of the reserved judgment, because the appeal challenging that EOGM decision had been heard over several dates and the tribunal considered preservation of the existing position necessary in view of the scheduled e-voting for the AGM.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>