<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 660 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444437</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling that charging interest under section 234C of the Income Tax Act was not valid. The appellant received an immovable property as a gift in the last quarter and paid more than 90% of the tax payable before the due date of the fourth quarter. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s argument justifiable, as the advance tax liability could not be estimated without the actual receipt of the gift, and there was no loss of revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 18:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 660 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444437</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, ruling that charging interest under section 234C of the Income Tax Act was not valid. The appellant received an immovable property as a gift in the last quarter and paid more than 90% of the tax payable before the due date of the fourth quarter. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s argument justifiable, as the advance tax liability could not be estimated without the actual receipt of the gift, and there was no loss of revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>