https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310277 The HC overturned the decree of a Court of Small Causes, which had dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery on an installment bond due to expired limitation. The HC found that the defendant's handwritten acknowledgments of payments, even if made after the limitation period, were sufficient under Section 20 of the Limitation Act to extend the limitation period. The court ruled that the plaintiff's suit was timely, as it was filed within three years of the last payment with a valid acknowledgment. The HC allowed the application, set aside the lower court's decision, and decreed the plaintiff's suit with costs. en-us Fri, 23 Dec 1932 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:55:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310277 The HC overturned the decree of a Court of Small Causes, which had dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery on an installment bond due to expired limitation. The HC found that the defendant's handwritten acknowledgments of payments, even if made after the limitation period, were sufficient under Section 20 of the Limitation Act to extend the limitation period. The court ruled that the plaintiff's suit was timely, as it was filed within three years of the last payment with a valid acknowledgment. The HC allowed the application, set aside the lower court's decision, and decreed the plaintiff's suit with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Dec 1932 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310277