https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444435 Delhi HC set aside transfer orders directing petitioners' cases from local jurisdiction to DCIT Mumbai. The orders were non-speaking, failed to provide reasons for transfer despite administrative convenience and coordinated investigation being cited, and lacked mandatory Document Identification Numbers required under CBDT Circular 19/2019. Court held Section 127(1) requires PCIT to specify reasons in transfer orders, and the impugned orders failed to address petitioners' objections or explain why transfer was necessary despite claims of coordinated investigation needs for related entity in Mumbai. en-us Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jan 2025 11:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444435 Delhi HC set aside transfer orders directing petitioners' cases from local jurisdiction to DCIT Mumbai. The orders were non-speaking, failed to provide reasons for transfer despite administrative convenience and coordinated investigation being cited, and lacked mandatory Document Identification Numbers required under CBDT Circular 19/2019. Court held Section 127(1) requires PCIT to specify reasons in transfer orders, and the impugned orders failed to address petitioners' objections or explain why transfer was necessary despite claims of coordinated investigation needs for related entity in Mumbai. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444435