<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 652 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444429</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of deduction claimed under section 80-IB for the Dadra unit due to the lapse of the eligibility period. It also upheld the disallowance of deduction under section 80IB/80IE for interest on staff advances and statutory/bank deposits. Expenses for doctors&#039; gifts were disallowed under section 37(1). The Tribunal directed a re-computation of disallowance under Rule 8D. ROC &amp;amp; stamp duty charges were disallowed as capital expenditure. The Tribunal rejected the adjustment for amortization of intangibles under section 115JB. Deductions under sections 80IE and 80IB/80IE were upheld. Selling and distribution expenses were allowed, and depreciation on Solar Power Generating System was upheld. Refund of central excise duty was considered a capital receipt and not taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2023 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 652 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444429</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of deduction claimed under section 80-IB for the Dadra unit due to the lapse of the eligibility period. It also upheld the disallowance of deduction under section 80IB/80IE for interest on staff advances and statutory/bank deposits. Expenses for doctors&#039; gifts were disallowed under section 37(1). The Tribunal directed a re-computation of disallowance under Rule 8D. ROC &amp;amp; stamp duty charges were disallowed as capital expenditure. The Tribunal rejected the adjustment for amortization of intangibles under section 115JB. Deductions under sections 80IE and 80IB/80IE were upheld. Selling and distribution expenses were allowed, and depreciation on Solar Power Generating System was upheld. Refund of central excise duty was considered a capital receipt and not taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>