<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 123 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34298</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed, granting the appellants relief as they were deemed to be commission agents entitled to the exemption under Notification No.13/2003-ST. The judgment clarified their status based on the activities performed and the commission received, establishing their eligibility for the exemption as providers of &#039;Business Auxiliary Services&#039;. The revenue&#039;s argument that they were not commission agents was rejected, emphasizing that the commission was tied to the quantity of goods sold, confirming their entitlement to the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 123 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34298</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed, granting the appellants relief as they were deemed to be commission agents entitled to the exemption under Notification No.13/2003-ST. The judgment clarified their status based on the activities performed and the commission received, establishing their eligibility for the exemption as providers of &#039;Business Auxiliary Services&#039;. The revenue&#039;s argument that they were not commission agents was rejected, emphasizing that the commission was tied to the quantity of goods sold, confirming their entitlement to the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>