<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 146 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34297</link>
    <description>The appellate order was found unsustainable because it did not clearly determine the basic classification issue of whether the respondent&#039;s services fell within Business Auxiliary Services and instead proceeded on an exemption notification. The Tribunal held that, without a clear finding on the applicable service classification, the matter had been decided on an incomplete and unclear basis. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh consideration of the classification question and connected issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 146 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34297</link>
      <description>The appellate order was found unsustainable because it did not clearly determine the basic classification issue of whether the respondent&#039;s services fell within Business Auxiliary Services and instead proceeded on an exemption notification. The Tribunal held that, without a clear finding on the applicable service classification, the matter had been decided on an incomplete and unclear basis. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh consideration of the classification question and connected issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>