<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Overturns Penalty for Missing Delivery Challan; Correct E-Way Bill Issued, Tax Paid; Section 122 Applies.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72566</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty - non availability of the delivery challan with the vehicles - In the instant case, there has been no evasion of tax. - E-way bill was properly generated. Tax was properly paid. It was mere non-compliance of the provisions of Section 55(5)(b) - Instead of proceeding u/s 129, the respondents authorities ought to have proceeded u/s 122. - Penalty order set aside - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2023 21:29:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 10:38:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Overturns Penalty for Missing Delivery Challan; Correct E-Way Bill Issued, Tax Paid; Section 122 Applies.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72566</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty - non availability of the delivery challan with the vehicles - In the instant case, there has been no evasion of tax. - E-way bill was properly generated. Tax was properly paid. It was mere non-compliance of the provisions of Section 55(5)(b) - Instead of proceeding u/s 129, the respondents authorities ought to have proceeded u/s 122. - Penalty order set aside - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2023 21:29:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>