https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444418 The HC examined a GST penalty order challenging ownership and tax evasion allegations. The court found the revenue's penalty under Section 129(1)(b) incorrect, noting the petitioner's documents demonstrated legitimate ownership. The HC set aside the penalty order and directed a fresh proceeding under Section 129(1)(a), allowing the petitioner to contest the order through available legal remedies. en-us Mon, 09 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444418 The HC examined a GST penalty order challenging ownership and tax evasion allegations. The court found the revenue's penalty under Section 129(1)(b) incorrect, noting the petitioner's documents demonstrated legitimate ownership. The HC set aside the penalty order and directed a fresh proceeding under Section 129(1)(a), allowing the petitioner to contest the order through available legal remedies. Case-Laws GST Mon, 09 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444418