<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 616 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444393</link>
    <description>Taxable income from life insurance business is computed under Section 44 read with Rule 2 of the First Schedule on the basis of the combined actuarial surplus from policyholders&#039; and shareholders&#039; accounts; the surplus shown only in Form I, without consolidation, is not the complete taxable surplus. On that basis, the addition made from Form I surplus was deleted. The loss or surplus arising from the approved pension fund was also held to form part of the actuarial computation for life insurance business and could not be separately disallowed merely because the Revenue disputed earlier precedent. The disallowance relating to the pension fund was therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2023 20:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 616 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444393</link>
      <description>Taxable income from life insurance business is computed under Section 44 read with Rule 2 of the First Schedule on the basis of the combined actuarial surplus from policyholders&#039; and shareholders&#039; accounts; the surplus shown only in Form I, without consolidation, is not the complete taxable surplus. On that basis, the addition made from Form I surplus was deleted. The loss or surplus arising from the approved pension fund was also held to form part of the actuarial computation for life insurance business and could not be separately disallowed merely because the Revenue disputed earlier precedent. The disallowance relating to the pension fund was therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>