https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444384 Access to a licensed area was set aside where it had been ordered at the initial stage without giving the appellant an opportunity to file a reply or place its case on record. The Tribunal held that the easement claim based on Section 13(e) of the Indian Easements Act, 1882 had been raised for the first time and required proper examination before any further direction. It also noted that the impugned order could create an erroneous impression of possession beyond the limited permissive use earlier recognised, so the matter required reconsideration on all relevant aspects. The appeal was allowed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 10 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Oct 2023 08:12:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444384 Access to a licensed area was set aside where it had been ordered at the initial stage without giving the appellant an opportunity to file a reply or place its case on record. The Tribunal held that the easement claim based on Section 13(e) of the Indian Easements Act, 1882 had been raised for the first time and required proper examination before any further direction. It also noted that the impugned order could create an erroneous impression of possession beyond the limited permissive use earlier recognised, so the matter required reconsideration on all relevant aspects. The appeal was allowed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 10 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444384