<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 604 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444381</link>
    <description>The appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was filed by the Operational Creditor against the rejection of their Section 9 application by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Jaipur Bench). The dispute arose from a contract between the Corporate Debtor and Amrop India Consultants Pvt. Ltd. (AICPL), later transferred to the Appellant. The Adjudicating Authority found genuine pre-existing disputes based on communications prior to the Section 8 demand notice, leading to the rejection of the Section 9 application. The Tribunal upheld this decision, dismissing the appeal and allowing the Appellant to seek alternative legal recourse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2023 08:12:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 604 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444381</link>
      <description>The appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was filed by the Operational Creditor against the rejection of their Section 9 application by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Jaipur Bench). The dispute arose from a contract between the Corporate Debtor and Amrop India Consultants Pvt. Ltd. (AICPL), later transferred to the Appellant. The Adjudicating Authority found genuine pre-existing disputes based on communications prior to the Section 8 demand notice, leading to the rejection of the Section 9 application. The Tribunal upheld this decision, dismissing the appeal and allowing the Appellant to seek alternative legal recourse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>