<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 594 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444371</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the appellant&#039;s yoga services as falling under the taxable category of &quot;health club and fitness centre.&quot; It ruled that donations received were considered consideration for the services provided, making them taxable. The Tribunal invoked the extended period of limitation due to the appellant&#039;s suppression of material facts to evade service tax. Penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 were upheld for non-compliance with statutory requirements, and interest under Section 75 was confirmed for delayed tax payment. The appeal was dismissed for the period 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2011, with a remand for recomputation for the period 01.10.2006 to 31.03.2007.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2023 19:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 594 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444371</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the appellant&#039;s yoga services as falling under the taxable category of &quot;health club and fitness centre.&quot; It ruled that donations received were considered consideration for the services provided, making them taxable. The Tribunal invoked the extended period of limitation due to the appellant&#039;s suppression of material facts to evade service tax. Penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 were upheld for non-compliance with statutory requirements, and interest under Section 75 was confirmed for delayed tax payment. The appeal was dismissed for the period 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2011, with a remand for recomputation for the period 01.10.2006 to 31.03.2007.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>