https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444362 A trust was treated as capable of prosecution for cheque dishonour because the expression "company" in Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was read to include an association of individuals, bringing trustees in charge within potential liability. The note also explains that revisional interference under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is limited to perversity, illegality, or non-consideration of material evidence, and does not permit routine reappreciation of evidence. As the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139, the concurrent conviction and sentence were upheld. en-us Mon, 18 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Oct 2023 19:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444362 A trust was treated as capable of prosecution for cheque dishonour because the expression "company" in Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was read to include an association of individuals, bringing trustees in charge within potential liability. The note also explains that revisional interference under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is limited to perversity, illegality, or non-consideration of material evidence, and does not permit routine reappreciation of evidence. As the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139, the concurrent conviction and sentence were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444362