<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1196 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310258</link>
    <description>Special Leave Petitions challenging the grant of default bail were dismissed, and the High Court&#039;s order under Section 167(2) CrPC was sustained. The Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the bail order, while clarifying that the High Court&#039;s observations were confined to the limited issue of the scope and ambit of default bail and do not affect the merits of the trial. Any broader question of law arising from the matter was expressly left open for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 21:25:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1196 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310258</link>
      <description>Special Leave Petitions challenging the grant of default bail were dismissed, and the High Court&#039;s order under Section 167(2) CrPC was sustained. The Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the bail order, while clarifying that the High Court&#039;s observations were confined to the limited issue of the scope and ambit of default bail and do not affect the merits of the trial. Any broader question of law arising from the matter was expressly left open for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>