https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310252 The Supreme Court declined to entertain Special Leave Petitions regarding the levy of differential tax of duty, upholding the decision not to entertain the petitions. The issue of penalty imposition was not addressed by the Division Bench, granting the petitioner the liberty to file Review Petitions within four weeks. The petitioner was allowed to approach the Supreme Court if the Review Petitions ruled against them. The judgment provided the petitioner with the opportunity to seek review of the penalty imposition at the Division Bench and, if needed, at the Supreme Court. en-us Sat, 11 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Oct 2023 21:25:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310252 The Supreme Court declined to entertain Special Leave Petitions regarding the levy of differential tax of duty, upholding the decision not to entertain the petitions. The issue of penalty imposition was not addressed by the Division Bench, granting the petitioner the liberty to file Review Petitions within four weeks. The petitioner was allowed to approach the Supreme Court if the Review Petitions ruled against them. The judgment provided the petitioner with the opportunity to seek review of the penalty imposition at the Division Bench and, if needed, at the Supreme Court. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Sat, 11 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310252