https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310225 Petitioners who were not named as accused lacked locus standi to seek quashing of the FIR or the connected CBI investigation initiated against other persons. On that basis, the SC declined to entertain their request to set aside the criminal proceedings. The Court also did not examine their prayer for relief under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 at that stage, while leaving them free to pursue appropriate remedies if they are later named by the investigating agency. en-us Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:02:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310225 Petitioners who were not named as accused lacked locus standi to seek quashing of the FIR or the connected CBI investigation initiated against other persons. On that basis, the SC declined to entertain their request to set aside the criminal proceedings. The Court also did not examine their prayer for relief under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 at that stage, while leaving them free to pursue appropriate remedies if they are later named by the investigating agency. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310225