<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 2011 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310221</link>
    <description>The appellant was convicted for murder under Section 302 of IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine. Additionally, the appellant was convicted under the Arms Act for possessing a pistol without a valid license, receiving three years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine. The court found eyewitness testimonies reliable, upheld the admissibility of the site plan, confirmed the integrity of evidence handling, and dismissed arguments regarding delays and non-production of certain evidence. Despite some witnesses being declared hostile, their testimonies still supported the prosecution&#039;s case. The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant&#039;s convictions and sentences were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:02:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 2011 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310221</link>
      <description>The appellant was convicted for murder under Section 302 of IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine. Additionally, the appellant was convicted under the Arms Act for possessing a pistol without a valid license, receiving three years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine. The court found eyewitness testimonies reliable, upheld the admissibility of the site plan, confirmed the integrity of evidence handling, and dismissed arguments regarding delays and non-production of certain evidence. Despite some witnesses being declared hostile, their testimonies still supported the prosecution&#039;s case. The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant&#039;s convictions and sentences were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>