https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310220 The court invoked inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash the orders of the Revisional Court and trial court. The petitioners, facing trial for IPC offences, had filed an application under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. to recall a witness for re-examination, which was allowed by the trial court but challenged in revision. The court held that the trial court's order allowing the application on the date fixed for judgment was illegal, emphasizing the need to pronounce judgments promptly after trial completion. The impugned orders were set aside, and the Trial Court was directed to reassess the evidence. en-us Sat, 31 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:02:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310220 The court invoked inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash the orders of the Revisional Court and trial court. The petitioners, facing trial for IPC offences, had filed an application under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. to recall a witness for re-examination, which was allowed by the trial court but challenged in revision. The court held that the trial court's order allowing the application on the date fixed for judgment was illegal, emphasizing the need to pronounce judgments promptly after trial completion. The impugned orders were set aside, and the Trial Court was directed to reassess the evidence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 31 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310220