https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310220 Recall or re-examination of a witness under Section 311 CrPC is permissible only when the evidence is essential to a just decision, and cannot be used simply to clarify a discrepancy after the case has been fixed for judgment. The Madhya Pradesh HC held that allowing recall of the doctor in these circumstances was contrary to law and therefore illegal. It further held that even if the order was interlocutory, the High Court could still interfere under its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to correct the illegality in the interest of justice. The order was set aside and the impugned orders were quashed. en-us Sat, 31 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:02:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310220 Recall or re-examination of a witness under Section 311 CrPC is permissible only when the evidence is essential to a just decision, and cannot be used simply to clarify a discrepancy after the case has been fixed for judgment. The Madhya Pradesh HC held that allowing recall of the doctor in these circumstances was contrary to law and therefore illegal. It further held that even if the order was interlocutory, the High Court could still interfere under its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to correct the illegality in the interest of justice. The order was set aside and the impugned orders were quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 31 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310220