https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34278 The Tribunal set aside the decision denying the benefit of reimbursable charges on a flat rate basis, remanding the case for a fresh review to consider all evidence. The rejection of the verification report by the Commissioner (Appeals) was deemed unjustified, emphasizing the need to review all accounts thoroughly. The appellant's failure to disclose the claimed exemption was considered suppression of facts, justifying the extended period invocation. The case highlighted the importance of comprehensive examination of evidence and the need to ensure a fair assessment based on the complete set of evidences presented. en-us Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34278 The Tribunal set aside the decision denying the benefit of reimbursable charges on a flat rate basis, remanding the case for a fresh review to consider all evidence. The rejection of the verification report by the Commissioner (Appeals) was deemed unjustified, emphasizing the need to review all accounts thoroughly. The appellant's failure to disclose the claimed exemption was considered suppression of facts, justifying the extended period invocation. The case highlighted the importance of comprehensive examination of evidence and the need to ensure a fair assessment based on the complete set of evidences presented. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34278