https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310226 The Supreme Court found a direction by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, requiring 72 hours' notice before potential arrest in a cognizable offence complaint, to be legally incorrect. Citing precedent, the Court vacated the direction, allowing for immediate arrest without advance notice. The first respondent retained the right to seek legal remedies if aggrieved. The petition was disposed of, and pending applications were resolved as part of the judgment. en-us Mon, 05 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:02:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310226 The Supreme Court found a direction by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, requiring 72 hours' notice before potential arrest in a cognizable offence complaint, to be legally incorrect. Citing precedent, the Court vacated the direction, allowing for immediate arrest without advance notice. The first respondent retained the right to seek legal remedies if aggrieved. The petition was disposed of, and pending applications were resolved as part of the judgment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310226