https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310233 The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the Assessing Officer's obligation to reconsider the issue, consider all additional evidence, and pass a fresh assessment order within six months as directed by the High Court. The Tribunal set aside the order and remitted the issue back to the Assessing Officer for compliance with the High Court's directive regarding the consideration of additional evidence. The decision did not address the concern raised by the assessee's counsel regarding the seized jewelry. en-us Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:02:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310233 The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the Assessing Officer's obligation to reconsider the issue, consider all additional evidence, and pass a fresh assessment order within six months as directed by the High Court. The Tribunal set aside the order and remitted the issue back to the Assessing Officer for compliance with the High Court's directive regarding the consideration of additional evidence. The decision did not address the concern raised by the assessee's counsel regarding the seized jewelry. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310233