https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310223 The Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the Single Judge's decision in favor of granting the petitioner the same benefit as the co-accused, directing compliance with the order to change the punishment from removal to compulsory retirement within a specified timeframe. The Court emphasized equality in disciplinary actions and cited legal precedents to support its decision, highlighting the limited scope for judicial interference in disciplinary matters unless there is shocking disproportionality or unequal treatment among similarly placed individuals. No costs were awarded, concluding the case. en-us Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:02:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310223 The Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the Single Judge's decision in favor of granting the petitioner the same benefit as the co-accused, directing compliance with the order to change the punishment from removal to compulsory retirement within a specified timeframe. The Court emphasized equality in disciplinary actions and cited legal precedents to support its decision, highlighting the limited scope for judicial interference in disciplinary matters unless there is shocking disproportionality or unequal treatment among similarly placed individuals. No costs were awarded, concluding the case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310223