<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 576 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444353</link>
    <description>HC ruled that the provisional bank account attachment orders under CGST Act, specifically the order dated 05.08.2022, were no longer operative. The court directed banks to not obstruct account operations and allowed the petitioner to challenge any future attachment orders, effectively rendering the current petition academic while preserving all parties&#039; rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 576 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444353</link>
      <description>HC ruled that the provisional bank account attachment orders under CGST Act, specifically the order dated 05.08.2022, were no longer operative. The court directed banks to not obstruct account operations and allowed the petitioner to challenge any future attachment orders, effectively rendering the current petition academic while preserving all parties&#039; rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>