<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 569 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444346</link>
    <description>The case focused on the jurisdiction of the Revenue to reassess completed/unabated assessments for specific years without incriminating material from search proceedings. The Court emphasized the necessity of incriminating material for such reassessments. The ITAT&#039;s decision, backed by prior rulings, held that without such material, the Revenue lacked jurisdiction to make additions. The Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation of relevant sections highlighted this requirement. The appellant&#039;s reliance on other cases was dismissed due to the absence of incriminating material. The judgment favored the Assessee, dismissing the appeal and keeping reassessment proceedings open for both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 569 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444346</link>
      <description>The case focused on the jurisdiction of the Revenue to reassess completed/unabated assessments for specific years without incriminating material from search proceedings. The Court emphasized the necessity of incriminating material for such reassessments. The ITAT&#039;s decision, backed by prior rulings, held that without such material, the Revenue lacked jurisdiction to make additions. The Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation of relevant sections highlighted this requirement. The appellant&#039;s reliance on other cases was dismissed due to the absence of incriminating material. The judgment favored the Assessee, dismissing the appeal and keeping reassessment proceedings open for both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>