<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 563 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444340</link>
    <description>The ITAT&#039;s decision to set aside the assessment order dated 11.12.2018 was upheld, as the order was improperly treated as a final assessment rather than a draft under Section 144-C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court found that the inclusion of a demand and penalty notice indicated a procedural lapse, rendering the assessment order null and void. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision as proper and justified, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 563 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444340</link>
      <description>The ITAT&#039;s decision to set aside the assessment order dated 11.12.2018 was upheld, as the order was improperly treated as a final assessment rather than a draft under Section 144-C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court found that the inclusion of a demand and penalty notice indicated a procedural lapse, rendering the assessment order null and void. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision as proper and justified, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>