<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 557 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444334</link>
    <description>The tribunal directed the AO to delete the additions made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act in the cases of Smt. Namita Bajaj and Smt. Lalita Bajaj, as the shares were sold at the same price they were acquired, resulting in no capital gain. The appeals were allowed on merits, and the tribunal found no valid reason to invoke Section 68, especially since the investment in shares was not disputed in the year of acquisition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:01:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 557 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444334</link>
      <description>The tribunal directed the AO to delete the additions made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act in the cases of Smt. Namita Bajaj and Smt. Lalita Bajaj, as the shares were sold at the same price they were acquired, resulting in no capital gain. The appeals were allowed on merits, and the tribunal found no valid reason to invoke Section 68, especially since the investment in shares was not disputed in the year of acquisition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>