<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 556 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444333</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the assessee in appeals against penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for assessment years 2011-12, 2013-14, and 2015-16. The court held that the assessee&#039;s claims, though not sustained in law, did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The penalty was deleted for all years, emphasizing the importance of bona fide explanations and lack of deliberate misrepresentation in the assessee&#039;s actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:01:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 556 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444333</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the assessee in appeals against penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for assessment years 2011-12, 2013-14, and 2015-16. The court held that the assessee&#039;s claims, though not sustained in law, did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The penalty was deleted for all years, emphasizing the importance of bona fide explanations and lack of deliberate misrepresentation in the assessee&#039;s actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>