<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 549 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444326</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order, confirming that the original assessment was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to valid reasons, but the higher depreciation claim on heavy vehicles was disallowed as the assessee failed to prove they were used on hire as required by law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 549 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444326</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order, confirming that the original assessment was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to valid reasons, but the higher depreciation claim on heavy vehicles was disallowed as the assessee failed to prove they were used on hire as required by law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>