<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 536 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444313</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the limitation period for filing an appeal under Section 61 of the IBC starts from the date of the order, not when the aggrieved party becomes aware of its contents. The Tribunal dismissed both Delay Condonation Applications as the appeals were filed beyond the prescribed limitation period and the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to condone delays exceeding 15 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 08:59:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 536 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444313</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the limitation period for filing an appeal under Section 61 of the IBC starts from the date of the order, not when the aggrieved party becomes aware of its contents. The Tribunal dismissed both Delay Condonation Applications as the appeals were filed beyond the prescribed limitation period and the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to condone delays exceeding 15 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>