https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444310 The court dismissed the petitioner's revision petition seeking discharge in a criminal case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Despite the petitioner's argument that witnesses did not implicate him in the alleged conspiracy, the court found substantial documentary evidence linking him to the crime through possession of keys to the bank locker where bribe money was hidden. The court clarified that the amendment to the Act in 2013 was retrospective, making the petitioner liable. The court emphasized the importance of documentary evidence and upheld the decision based on the agreement between the accused regarding bail and the evidence presented. en-us Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Oct 2023 11:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444310 The court dismissed the petitioner's revision petition seeking discharge in a criminal case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Despite the petitioner's argument that witnesses did not implicate him in the alleged conspiracy, the court found substantial documentary evidence linking him to the crime through possession of keys to the bank locker where bribe money was hidden. The court clarified that the amendment to the Act in 2013 was retrospective, making the petitioner liable. The court emphasized the importance of documentary evidence and upheld the decision based on the agreement between the accused regarding bail and the evidence presented. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444310