https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444308 Default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC was unavailable because the complaint filed on 12.06.2023 was treated as a final report after completion of investigation in the first ECIR, and cognizance had already been taken. The Court held that permissible further investigation, including a subsequent complaint under Section 44 of the PMLA, did not render the filed report incomplete; since the report was filed within the statutory period, the right to default bail did not survive. en-us Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Oct 2023 08:58:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444308 Default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC was unavailable because the complaint filed on 12.06.2023 was treated as a final report after completion of investigation in the first ECIR, and cognizance had already been taken. The Court held that permissible further investigation, including a subsequent complaint under Section 44 of the PMLA, did not render the filed report incomplete; since the report was filed within the statutory period, the right to default bail did not survive. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444308