<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 520 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444297</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Writ Petition, setting aside the order in G.O.(D).No.78 dated 28.05.2020. The respondents were directed to grant due increments, seniority, and promotion to the petitioner on par with his junior colleague. The Court emphasized that there was no element of ulterior motive on the petitioner&#039;s part and that the same benevolence shown to the head of the inspection team should be extended to the team members.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=728959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 520 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444297</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Writ Petition, setting aside the order in G.O.(D).No.78 dated 28.05.2020. The respondents were directed to grant due increments, seniority, and promotion to the petitioner on par with his junior colleague. The Court emphasized that there was no element of ulterior motive on the petitioner&#039;s part and that the same benevolence shown to the head of the inspection team should be extended to the team members.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>